Why no one wants a new car now - WSJ

For off-topic posts only (i.e. non 356 related content). No politics, religion or obscenity. Play nice!
Message
Author
User avatar
Brian R Adams
356 Fan
Posts: 3731
Joined: Thu Mar 27, 2008 1:34 pm
Location: N. Nevada

Re: Why no one wants a new car now - WSJ

#61 Post by Brian R Adams »

Bill Lawless wrote: Thu Aug 29, 2024 6:50 am All Solar panels have the same/similar "efficiency rating" wherever they are installed.. :idea:
I see what you did there. Cute. It only requires more of them.
-
Welcome to the era of policy-based evidence-making.

Difficile est saturam non scribere (Juvenal)

User avatar
Bill Lawless
356 Fan
Posts: 1002
Joined: Mon Oct 25, 2010 10:17 pm
Location: Northern Vermont

Re: Why no one wants a new car now - WSJ

#62 Post by Bill Lawless »

:idea: It took a while to get there ??
 Thanks,
Bill
65' 356 SC Cab Irish Green :D
82' SC Targa
81 VW Westfalia with 2015 Forester Engine
BMW 64'-R50/2, 75'-BMW R90/6, 74' BMW R90/6, Yamaha BW350

Larry Brooks
356 Fan
Posts: 825
Joined: Sun Apr 13, 2008 10:16 pm
Location: Tigard, Oregon

Re: Why no one wants a new car now - WSJ

#63 Post by Larry Brooks »

Harlan Halsey wrote: Thu Aug 29, 2024 4:36 am Vermont's export of Bernie Sanders indicates something unrealistic about that state. Were it up to me I would limit the population of a state to that which can be supported by hydro power. (Solar power comes from China via their control of rare earths.) Fairly redistributing the power generated by the Grand Coulee and Hover dams could occupy the Federal Government in addition to its other awesome responsibilities. Then I wonder what the tradeoff between EVs and people would be? Brian?
List Of Hydroelectricity Producing US States By National Percentage

Rank State Percentage of National Hydroelectricity Production
1 Washington 37
2 California 13
3 Oregon 11
4 New York 6

User avatar
Brian R Adams
356 Fan
Posts: 3731
Joined: Thu Mar 27, 2008 1:34 pm
Location: N. Nevada

Re: Why no one wants a new car now - WSJ

#64 Post by Brian R Adams »

How about consumption? Four states rely on hydroelectricity for at least half of their electric power:

1 Washington
2 Idaho
3 Oregon
4 Vermont
-
Welcome to the era of policy-based evidence-making.

Difficile est saturam non scribere (Juvenal)

Nathan Miller
356 Fan
Posts: 150
Joined: Sat Sep 30, 2023 6:22 pm
Location: Yucaipa, CA

Re: Why no one wants a new car now - WSJ

#65 Post by Nathan Miller »

Harlan Halsey wrote: Thu Aug 29, 2024 4:36 am Were it up to me I would limit the population of a state to that which can be supported by hydro power.
How would you limit a state's population?

User avatar
Brian R Adams
356 Fan
Posts: 3731
Joined: Thu Mar 27, 2008 1:34 pm
Location: N. Nevada

Re: Why no one wants a new car now - WSJ

#66 Post by Brian R Adams »

Nathan Miller wrote: Sat Aug 31, 2024 7:53 pm
Harlan Halsey wrote: Thu Aug 29, 2024 4:36 am Were it up to me I would limit the population of a state to that which can be supported by hydro power.
How would you limit a state's population?
Government edict under the National Emergencies Act (1976) would be step one. It gets a little messy after that.
-
Welcome to the era of policy-based evidence-making.

Difficile est saturam non scribere (Juvenal)

User avatar
Michael Branning
Registry Trustee
Posts: 770
Joined: Sun Dec 01, 1991 2:08 pm
Location: Arden NC within sight of the Blue Ridge Parkway
Instagram: @mtbranning
Contact:

Re: Why no one wants a new car now - WSJ

#67 Post by Michael Branning »

Brian R Adams wrote: Sat Aug 31, 2024 8:21 pm
Nathan Miller wrote: Sat Aug 31, 2024 7:53 pm
Harlan Halsey wrote: Thu Aug 29, 2024 4:36 am Were it up to me I would limit the population of a state to that which can be supported by hydro power.
How would you limit a state's population?
Government edict under the National Emergencies Act (1976) would be step one. It gets a little messy after that.
-
At the rate we are going, we are going to have to create an Off-Off-Off-Topic Forum. Wasn't this thread about why nobody wanted a new car? :lol:
Michael Branning
356 Registry Vice President/Trustee
'64 SR Coupe
61 S90 Roadster

User avatar
Martin Benade
356 Fan
Posts: 13358
Joined: Wed Nov 23, 2011 10:52 am
Location: Cleveland, Ohio

Re: Why no one wants a new car now - WSJ

#68 Post by Martin Benade »

It’s a slippery slope, but at least it’s going down hill.

And Brian, sometimes the depth of your knowledge is unnatural.
Cleveland Ohio
62 Cabriolet
56 VW
02 IS 300
04 Sienna

User avatar
Michael Branning
Registry Trustee
Posts: 770
Joined: Sun Dec 01, 1991 2:08 pm
Location: Arden NC within sight of the Blue Ridge Parkway
Instagram: @mtbranning
Contact:

Re: Why no one wants a new car now - WSJ

#69 Post by Michael Branning »

Martin Benade wrote: Sat Aug 31, 2024 8:53 pm And Brian, sometimes the depth of your knowledge is unnatural.
+1

Brian, I don’t always agree with every point you advocate, but the insights and data you share are impressive.
Michael Branning
356 Registry Vice President/Trustee
'64 SR Coupe
61 S90 Roadster

User avatar
Bill Lawless
356 Fan
Posts: 1002
Joined: Mon Oct 25, 2010 10:17 pm
Location: Northern Vermont

Re: Why no one wants a new car now - WSJ

#70 Post by Bill Lawless »

Michael Branning wrote: Sat Aug 31, 2024 8:37 pm
Brian R Adams wrote: Sat Aug 31, 2024 8:21 pm
Nathan Miller wrote: Sat Aug 31, 2024 7:53 pm
Harlan Halsey wrote: Thu Aug 29, 2024 4:36 am Were it up to me I would limit the population of a state to that which can be supported by hydro power.
How would you limit a state's population?
Government edict under the National Emergencies Act (1976) would be step one. It gets a little messy after that.
-
At the rate we are going, we are going to have to create an Off-Off-Off-Topic Forum. Wasn't this thread about why nobody wanted a new car? :lol:
I agree Michael, way off topic, I going back to talking about 356's.. Always remember to Fact Check!!!
 Thanks,
Bill
65' 356 SC Cab Irish Green :D
82' SC Targa
81 VW Westfalia with 2015 Forester Engine
BMW 64'-R50/2, 75'-BMW R90/6, 74' BMW R90/6, Yamaha BW350

User avatar
Brian R Adams
356 Fan
Posts: 3731
Joined: Thu Mar 27, 2008 1:34 pm
Location: N. Nevada

Re: Why no one wants a new car now - WSJ

#71 Post by Brian R Adams »

Bill Lawless wrote: Sun Sep 01, 2024 8:59 am Always remember to Fact Check!!!
But fact-check the Fact Checkers. Their record (easily reviewable) on charged stories in the past couple of years does not inspire confidence. Consider the sponsoring organization as the lead clue.
-
Welcome to the era of policy-based evidence-making.

Difficile est saturam non scribere (Juvenal)

User avatar
Brian R Adams
356 Fan
Posts: 3731
Joined: Thu Mar 27, 2008 1:34 pm
Location: N. Nevada

Re: Why no one wants a new car now - WSJ

#72 Post by Brian R Adams »

Vermont is the greenest state in the U.S., according to ConsumerAffairs.
And Vermont's average household electricity price (cents/kWh) is 32% higher than the U.S. average, and higher than 24 of 39 European countries (per Energy Information Agency).

Top Ten most expensive household electricity price states:

1. Hawaii
2. California
3. Rhode Island
4. Massachusetts
5. Connecticut
6. Maine
7. New Hampshire
8. Alaska
9. New York
10. Vermont

-
Welcome to the era of policy-based evidence-making.

Difficile est saturam non scribere (Juvenal)

User avatar
Brian R Adams
356 Fan
Posts: 3731
Joined: Thu Mar 27, 2008 1:34 pm
Location: N. Nevada

Re: Why no one wants a new car now - WSJ

#73 Post by Brian R Adams »

Back on topic:

Story in The Telegraph (excerpts):

Car makers are rationing sales of petrol and hybrid vehicles in Britain to avoid hefty net zero fines, according to one of the country’s biggest dealership chains.

Robert Forrester, chief executive of Vertu Motors, said manufacturers were delaying deliveries of cars until next year amid fears they will otherwise breach quotas set for them by the Government.

This means someone ordering a car today at some dealerships will not receive it until February, he said.

At the same time, Mr Forrester warned manufacturers and dealers were grappling with a glut of more expensive electric vehicles (EVs) that are “not easily finding homes”. He said: “In some franchises there’s a restriction on supply of petrol cars and hybrid cars, which is actually where the demand is.

“It’s almost as if we can’t supply the cars that people want, but we’ve got plenty of the cars that they don’t want.”

The chief executive blamed the zero emission vehicle (ZEV) mandate, which requires at least 22pc of cars sold by manufacturers to be electric from this year.

Mr Forrester added that although some people might cheer falling electric car prices, supporters of the ZEV mandate in its current form were “economic buffoons, because car manufacturers are being forced to discount EVs to such an extent that they’re making losses…and that is not a good thing for business”.

“As Carlos Tavares [chief executive of Stellantis] has said, why should they sell cars at a loss because of UK government policy?

The new car market is no longer a market, unfortunately. It’s a state-imposed supply chain.

-
Welcome to the era of policy-based evidence-making.

Difficile est saturam non scribere (Juvenal)

Nathan Miller
356 Fan
Posts: 150
Joined: Sat Sep 30, 2023 6:22 pm
Location: Yucaipa, CA

Re: Why no one wants a new car now - WSJ

#74 Post by Nathan Miller »

I read that Chinese car company, BYD, is building EVs that are selling for $11,400 equivalent. Biden put a 100% tariff on cars from China to keep auto assembly jobs in the US. Biden knows I am too stupid to know how best to spend my money, but I can't wonder how helpful it would be to low income families to be able to buy a new car for $11,000.

https://insideevs.com/news/710364/byd-d ... -caresoft/

User avatar
Brian R Adams
356 Fan
Posts: 3731
Joined: Thu Mar 27, 2008 1:34 pm
Location: N. Nevada

Re: Why no one wants a new car now - WSJ

#75 Post by Brian R Adams »

Nathan Miller wrote: Sun Sep 08, 2024 3:36 pm I read that Chinese car company, BYD, is building EVs that are selling for $11,400 equivalent. Biden put a 100% tariff on cars from China to keep auto assembly jobs in the US.
The mythical "affordable" EV is touted at $25,000. So even with a 100% tariff, that Chinese EV should find buyers. Obviously there's more involved than meets the eye. It's just possible that even at an affordable price, too many people are anxious about range, charging, and robustness. (Even a minor fender-bender can earmark the battery pack as a "forklift" item, and ergo totals the car. Are batteries covered by insurance policies, and at what premium?)
-
Welcome to the era of policy-based evidence-making.

Difficile est saturam non scribere (Juvenal)

Post Reply