I see what you did there. Cute. It only requires more of them.Bill Lawless wrote: ↑Thu Aug 29, 2024 6:50 am All Solar panels have the same/similar "efficiency rating" wherever they are installed..
-
I see what you did there. Cute. It only requires more of them.Bill Lawless wrote: ↑Thu Aug 29, 2024 6:50 am All Solar panels have the same/similar "efficiency rating" wherever they are installed..
List Of Hydroelectricity Producing US States By National PercentageHarlan Halsey wrote: ↑Thu Aug 29, 2024 4:36 am Vermont's export of Bernie Sanders indicates something unrealistic about that state. Were it up to me I would limit the population of a state to that which can be supported by hydro power. (Solar power comes from China via their control of rare earths.) Fairly redistributing the power generated by the Grand Coulee and Hover dams could occupy the Federal Government in addition to its other awesome responsibilities. Then I wonder what the tradeoff between EVs and people would be? Brian?
How would you limit a state's population?Harlan Halsey wrote: ↑Thu Aug 29, 2024 4:36 am Were it up to me I would limit the population of a state to that which can be supported by hydro power.
Government edict under the National Emergencies Act (1976) would be step one. It gets a little messy after that.Nathan Miller wrote: ↑Sat Aug 31, 2024 7:53 pmHow would you limit a state's population?Harlan Halsey wrote: ↑Thu Aug 29, 2024 4:36 am Were it up to me I would limit the population of a state to that which can be supported by hydro power.
At the rate we are going, we are going to have to create an Off-Off-Off-Topic Forum. Wasn't this thread about why nobody wanted a new car?Brian R Adams wrote: ↑Sat Aug 31, 2024 8:21 pmGovernment edict under the National Emergencies Act (1976) would be step one. It gets a little messy after that.Nathan Miller wrote: ↑Sat Aug 31, 2024 7:53 pmHow would you limit a state's population?Harlan Halsey wrote: ↑Thu Aug 29, 2024 4:36 am Were it up to me I would limit the population of a state to that which can be supported by hydro power.
-
+1Martin Benade wrote: ↑Sat Aug 31, 2024 8:53 pm And Brian, sometimes the depth of your knowledge is unnatural.
I agree Michael, way off topic, I going back to talking about 356's.. Always remember to Fact Check!!!Michael Branning wrote: ↑Sat Aug 31, 2024 8:37 pmAt the rate we are going, we are going to have to create an Off-Off-Off-Topic Forum. Wasn't this thread about why nobody wanted a new car?Brian R Adams wrote: ↑Sat Aug 31, 2024 8:21 pmGovernment edict under the National Emergencies Act (1976) would be step one. It gets a little messy after that.Nathan Miller wrote: ↑Sat Aug 31, 2024 7:53 pmHow would you limit a state's population?Harlan Halsey wrote: ↑Thu Aug 29, 2024 4:36 am Were it up to me I would limit the population of a state to that which can be supported by hydro power.
-
But fact-check the Fact Checkers. Their record (easily reviewable) on charged stories in the past couple of years does not inspire confidence. Consider the sponsoring organization as the lead clue.
And Vermont's average household electricity price (cents/kWh) is 32% higher than the U.S. average, and higher than 24 of 39 European countries (per Energy Information Agency).Vermont is the greenest state in the U.S., according to ConsumerAffairs.
The mythical "affordable" EV is touted at $25,000. So even with a 100% tariff, that Chinese EV should find buyers. Obviously there's more involved than meets the eye. It's just possible that even at an affordable price, too many people are anxious about range, charging, and robustness. (Even a minor fender-bender can earmark the battery pack as a "forklift" item, and ergo totals the car. Are batteries covered by insurance policies, and at what premium?)Nathan Miller wrote: ↑Sun Sep 08, 2024 3:36 pm I read that Chinese car company, BYD, is building EVs that are selling for $11,400 equivalent. Biden put a 100% tariff on cars from China to keep auto assembly jobs in the US.