Fan Shroud Mods

For those who obsess about exactly how their 356 left the factory!
Post Reply
Message
Author
User avatar
Dennis Vogel
356 Fan
Posts: 505
Joined: Sat Oct 25, 2008 6:10 pm
Location: Santa Rosa, CA
Contact:

Fan Shroud Mods

#1 Post by Dennis Vogel »

Can anyone confirm my suspicions that the following are knucklehead modifications to our fan shroud, and not meant to be there?
  • The end of the shroud is not meant to be concave, but follow the curve of the profile as viewed from the back.
  • Holes # 1 and 2 are all the way through both sides. The 3rd one gets blocked by the oil cooler when installed.
  • Holes # 4 and 5 are threaded. Meant to be there, but get the rubber plugs.
Thanks.
Photo Apr 05, 9 50 43 AM.jpg
Photo Apr 05, 9 50 43 AM.jpg (276.63 KiB) Viewed 2117 times
Photo Apr 05, 9 49 19 AM.jpg
Photo Apr 05, 9 49 19 AM.jpg (281.04 KiB) Viewed 2117 times
1960 356 S90 Sunroof Coupe
1970 914-6
2014 Carrera S

User avatar
Mike Wilson
Classifieds Monitor
Posts: 11621
Joined: Tue Apr 15, 2008 4:37 pm
Location: SW Los Angeles

Re: Fan Shroud Mods

#2 Post by Mike Wilson »

The left side bent in is incorrect and holes 1, 2 and 3 are not factory.

Mike
Mike Wilson
Lomita, CA
'63 B coupe

Jim Hohensee
356 Fan
Posts: 146
Joined: Sat Dec 04, 2010 10:50 pm
Location: Buffalo, NY

Re: Fan Shroud Mods

#3 Post by Jim Hohensee »

P4070002 (Medium).jpeg
P4070002 (Medium).jpeg (132.87 KiB) Viewed 2017 times
I agree with Mike on the non-original holes. While getting a fan shroud ready for refurbishing yesterday I noticed a radio static eliminator device on the shroud which certainly looks original. Thought I'd share it with you.
Attachments
P4070001 (Medium).jpeg
P4070001 (Medium).jpeg (114.57 KiB) Viewed 2017 times

User avatar
Mike Wilson
Classifieds Monitor
Posts: 11621
Joined: Tue Apr 15, 2008 4:37 pm
Location: SW Los Angeles

Re: Fan Shroud Mods

#4 Post by Mike Wilson »

Interesting placement. Usually on the voltage regulator and generator.

Mike
Mike Wilson
Lomita, CA
'63 B coupe

User avatar
Paul Hatfield
356 Registry Member
Posts: 1149
Joined: Tue Mar 25, 2008 5:46 pm
Location: Washington State
Contact:

Re: Fan Shroud Mods

#5 Post by Paul Hatfield »

Mine is shown in the photo below. It is mounted on the voltage regulator. Same type of clamp, different rating than the one shown above, and different connections with the two screws on mine. It came with the car, which is about all I can tell you about it.
Attachments
IMG_3804.jpg
IMG_3804.jpg (114.1 KiB) Viewed 1992 times
Paul Hatfield
"Miss April"
http://www.enginesinback.com

User avatar
Paul Hatfield
356 Registry Member
Posts: 1149
Joined: Tue Mar 25, 2008 5:46 pm
Location: Washington State
Contact:

Re: Fan Shroud Mods

#6 Post by Paul Hatfield »

I did a little research, and John Bunin did a post about the noise suppressors back on 4/26/2010.
Here is his comment:

Bosch radio interference condensers for Porsche 356B/C:

EMKO 9Z17Z Ignition coil, term 15; Regulator, term B+
EMKO 21Z1Z Generator, term D+; Regulator, term D+/61
EMKO 21Z2Z Regulator, term B+
Paul Hatfield
"Miss April"
http://www.enginesinback.com

User avatar
James Davies
356Talk Moderator
Posts: 2959
Joined: Thu Aug 15, 2013 9:15 am
Location: Heidelberg, DE

Re: Fan Shroud Mods

#7 Post by James Davies »

Jim, that Bosch EMKO 9Z 17Z is original to your car, likely. The "H" stamped on it dates it to 1952. Your car must have originally came with a radio. And the mounting is in exactly the correct spot. Same as VW.

Porsche used Beru and Bosch condensers during this period.
Attachments
20141218_40d_3628f.jpg
20141218_40d_3628f.jpg (1.9 MiB) Viewed 1632 times

Jon Bunin
356 Fan
Posts: 1804
Joined: Thu Oct 15, 2009 11:06 pm
Location: Vista, CA

Re: Fan Shroud Mods

#8 Post by Jon Bunin »

James Davies wrote: Mon Aug 02, 2021 11:36 pm Jim, that Bosch EMKO 9Z 17Z is original to your car, likely. The "H" stamped on it dates it to 1952...
James, I don't think that's an "H" date stamp on Jim's condenser. It's not similar to other Bosch "H" date stamps that I've seen.
I suspect it's probably a "T" for 1962, preceded by a Roman "1" for Q1 (Jan-March). Maybe Jim can take a closer look, and let us know.
Jon Bunin

Jim Hohensee
356 Fan
Posts: 146
Joined: Sat Dec 04, 2010 10:50 pm
Location: Buffalo, NY

Re: Fan Shroud Mods

#9 Post by Jim Hohensee »

I am not trying to ignore the groups requiste for a better look at the stamp on my condenser but I put it in a "special place" and can't find it. Don't suppose any of you have ever done that. I agree that it is very unlikely that came from 1952. The fan shround was definetly not that old. 1962 would make more sense. It was something I had in stock for a very long time and not on an engine. If and when I find it I will take some very close up photos and post.

User avatar
James Davies
356Talk Moderator
Posts: 2959
Joined: Thu Aug 15, 2013 9:15 am
Location: Heidelberg, DE

Re: Fan Shroud Mods

#10 Post by James Davies »

Jon Bunin wrote: Tue Aug 03, 2021 1:20 am
James Davies wrote: Mon Aug 02, 2021 11:36 pm Jim, that Bosch EMKO 9Z 17Z is original to your car, likely. The "H" stamped on it dates it to 1952...
James, I don't think that's an "H" date stamp on Jim's condenser. It's not similar to other Bosch "H" date stamps that I've seen.
Agree Jon. Thanks for catching that. The early 50s condensers I have have the stamp on the bracket, and it's the full date stamp with month number and letter year.

Post Reply