Finish on the bumper trim on '55 & a surprise

For Pre A discussions and questions
Post Reply
Message
Author
Vincent Gillespie
356 Fan
Posts: 439
Joined: Sun Jul 18, 2010 8:33 am
Location: United Kingdom

Finish on the bumper trim on '55 & a surprise

#1 Post by Vincent Gillespie »

Hello all, I dropped off my bumper trims yesterday to the polishers to see if they could be resurrected, and he asked if I was going to have them anodised. He thought, from looking at the best bits where the rubbers had been, this was the original finish, I thought they were just polished ally is he correct? It is also interesting to note the weight diference between the originals and the modern replacements and one from sometime in the 70's, they are much lighter.

Thought you might like to see a picture of the first time I saw KCT in the 1st top coat, it came as somewhat of a nice 'shock' after all these years of it being a project.
V&S
Attachments
2017-04-10 09.19.07.jpg
V. Gillespie

User avatar
Joris Koning
356 Fan
Posts: 2505
Joined: Thu Mar 27, 2008 12:38 pm
Location: Netherlands

Re: Finish on the bumper trim on '55 & a surprise

#2 Post by Joris Koning »

I have some true NOS deco's (not 70's or 80's production) on my '57 and call tell you that those are bare and not anodized like the later deco's
'56 Coupe
'57 Coupe
'59 Cab 
'60 Coupe

User avatar
Phil Planck
356 Fan
Posts: 2030
Joined: Wed Mar 26, 2008 7:21 pm
Location: NE Michigan, lower penn.

Re: Finish on the bumper trim on '55 & a surprise

#3 Post by Phil Planck »

53248 decos were not annodized
Phil Planck

User avatar
Spencer Harris
356 Fan
Posts: 1149
Joined: Thu Mar 27, 2008 12:39 pm
Location: San Joaquin Valley, California

Re: Finish on the bumper trim on '55 & a surprise

#4 Post by Spencer Harris »

Original decos on 53449 are not anodized. According to Johnson's book the windshield and rear window moldings were not bright anodized until the T6 bodies; presumably the same for bumper and rocker decos.
She looks beautiful in blue!
Spencer Harris
San Joaquin Valley, CA.

Vincent Gillespie
356 Fan
Posts: 439
Joined: Sun Jul 18, 2010 8:33 am
Location: United Kingdom

Re: Finish on the bumper trim on '55 & a surprise

#5 Post by Vincent Gillespie »

Thanks for your help, I didn't think they would have been and, although it was nice and shiney where the rubber had been protecting the ally, it didn't seem to me to have the same glossiness as the 1970's replacement I have hanging up and certainly nothing like those from Stoddards I bought a couple of years ago.
V
V. Gillespie

User avatar
Spencer Harris
356 Fan
Posts: 1149
Joined: Thu Mar 27, 2008 12:39 pm
Location: San Joaquin Valley, California

Re: Finish on the bumper trim on '55 & a surprise

#6 Post by Spencer Harris »

Dingo my Ziwi metal guy told me you can remove anodizing using conventional oven cleaner. I haven't tried it yet, but plan to dabble with some windshield trim pieces.
Spencer Harris
San Joaquin Valley, CA.

User avatar
Martin Benade
356 Fan
Posts: 12179
Joined: Wed Nov 23, 2011 10:52 am
Location: Cleveland, Ohio

Re: Finish on the bumper trim on '55 & a surprise

#7 Post by Martin Benade »

Fine sandpaper certainly removes it nicely.
Cleveland Ohio
62 Cabriolet
56 VW
02 IS 300
04 Sienna

Martin Bruechle
356 Fan
Posts: 392
Joined: Thu Feb 23, 2017 12:41 am
Location: So Cal

Re: Finish on the bumper trim on '55 & a surprise

#8 Post by Martin Bruechle »

Martin Benade wrote:Fine sandpaper certainly removes it nicely.
What grit would you recommend for starting off with and final grit ?
Wet sand I presume ?

User avatar
Martin Benade
356 Fan
Posts: 12179
Joined: Wed Nov 23, 2011 10:52 am
Location: Cleveland, Ohio

Re: Finish on the bumper trim on '55 & a surprise

#9 Post by Martin Benade »

600 is good to start, and then 1200 or 1500 will be smooth enough to buff up pretty easily. Gouges and scrapes can even be filed and sanded with coarser paper such as 220, then just work up to the finer grits. Done carefully a pretty poor part can be made beautiful.
Cleveland Ohio
62 Cabriolet
56 VW
02 IS 300
04 Sienna

Post Reply