'55 Intake Manifold
- Alan Hall
- 356 Fan
- Posts: 1462
- Joined: Wed Mar 26, 2008 12:06 pm
- Location: Orinda, CA
'55 Intake Manifold
I have a '55 3-pc case 546/2 motor and am trying to make sure I have the correct set of parts for it. Does anyone know when the intake manifolds changed from the type with the bolt together balance tube connections to the type with the cast in connection piece?
- Donald Zingg
- 356 Fan
- Posts: 376
- Joined: Mon Mar 05, 2012 3:03 pm
- Location: Sunny So. California
- Contact:
Re: '55 Intake Manifold
Alan,
The intake manifold with cast-in nipple for the balance tube was an improved design for the type 616/1 and 616/2 engines. Your 1500 Normal engine originally would have had the earlier manifold design pictured below- - - -- -
The intake manifold with cast-in nipple for the balance tube was an improved design for the type 616/1 and 616/2 engines. Your 1500 Normal engine originally would have had the earlier manifold design pictured below- - - -- -
- Alan Hall
- 356 Fan
- Posts: 1462
- Joined: Wed Mar 26, 2008 12:06 pm
- Location: Orinda, CA
Re: '55 Intake Manifold
thanks Don.
- James Davies
- 356Talk Moderator
- Posts: 2959
- Joined: Thu Aug 15, 2013 9:15 am
- Location: Heidelberg, DE
Re: '55 Intake Manifold
Weren't the 616/1 intakes a bit taller than the 546 and 546/2 versions pictured above? That necessitated the use of the same throttle linkage rod used by the 616/2 and 528/2 engines.
- Vic Skirmants
- Registry Hall of Fame
- Posts: 9302
- Joined: Tue Oct 27, 2009 5:02 pm
- Location: SE Michigan
- Contact:
Re: '55 Intake Manifold
I think you are correct.James Davies wrote:Weren't the 616/1 intakes a bit taller than the 546 and 546/2 versions pictured above? That necessitated the use of the same throttle linkage rod used by the 616/2 and 528/2 engines.
- Craig Richter
- 356 Fan
- Posts: 1305
- Joined: Thu Dec 15, 2011 9:01 pm
- Location: San Miguel de Allende/Traunkirchen
- Alan Hall
- 356 Fan
- Posts: 1462
- Joined: Wed Mar 26, 2008 12:06 pm
- Location: Orinda, CA
Re: '55 Intake Manifold
James, The 546 manifold is quite a bit shorter. Left to right in attached photo: 616/2 Super, 616/1 Normal, 546 Normal, 528 Super.
- James Davies
- 356Talk Moderator
- Posts: 2959
- Joined: Thu Aug 15, 2013 9:15 am
- Location: Heidelberg, DE
Re: '55 Intake Manifold
Great photo Alan! Thanks.
- Vic Skirmants
- Registry Hall of Fame
- Posts: 9302
- Joined: Tue Oct 27, 2009 5:02 pm
- Location: SE Michigan
- Contact:
Re: '55 Intake Manifold
That photo is a good example of Porsche figuring out better air flow into the heads.
- James Davies
- 356Talk Moderator
- Posts: 2959
- Joined: Thu Aug 15, 2013 9:15 am
- Location: Heidelberg, DE
Re: '55 Intake Manifold
Yes Vic, and also cost savings. The number of bespoke parts required for building normal and super engines side-by-side on the production line went down significantly. With the 1600 engines, normals and supers now used the same throttle linkage rod, same spark plug engine tin and same balance tube.
- Vic Skirmants
- Registry Hall of Fame
- Posts: 9302
- Joined: Tue Oct 27, 2009 5:02 pm
- Location: SE Michigan
- Contact:
Re: '55 Intake Manifold
And same heads. No longer small ports for Normals and larger ones for Supers.James Davies wrote:Yes Vic, and also cost savings. The number of bespoke parts required for building normal and super engines side-by-side on the production line went down significantly. With the 1600 engines, normals and supers now used the same throttle linkage rod, same spark plug engine tin and same balance tube.
- James Davies
- 356Talk Moderator
- Posts: 2959
- Joined: Thu Aug 15, 2013 9:15 am
- Location: Heidelberg, DE
Re: '55 Intake Manifold
True! Though I think the first 616/2 heads were different from the 616/1 heads. They had a a split down the middle, partially separating the head for each cylinder, though I think this was only for a short time in 1956.
And perhaps the 616/2 heads also had a fin in each intake port shrouding the valve guide? I know the 528 and 528/2 heads had this fin. Did the 616/1 heads have this fin?
And perhaps the 616/2 heads also had a fin in each intake port shrouding the valve guide? I know the 528 and 528/2 heads had this fin. Did the 616/1 heads have this fin?
- Vic Skirmants
- Registry Hall of Fame
- Posts: 9302
- Joined: Tue Oct 27, 2009 5:02 pm
- Location: SE Michigan
- Contact:
Re: '55 Intake Manifold
3-piece case heads only had the fin starting with the C, SC heads.
Not many heads here anymore of the earliest type, so I can't vouch that the 616/1 heads did or didn't have the fin.
I wasn't aware that the 528 heads had the fin; always thought they were somebody's porting efforts.
Not many heads here anymore of the earliest type, so I can't vouch that the 616/1 heads did or didn't have the fin.
I wasn't aware that the 528 heads had the fin; always thought they were somebody's porting efforts.
- Alan Hall
- 356 Fan
- Posts: 1462
- Joined: Wed Mar 26, 2008 12:06 pm
- Location: Orinda, CA
Re: '55 Intake Manifold
Since we seem to be getting into sort of esoteric trivia on very early parts I noticed that there are at least three versions of the 546 manifolds. The earliest (I suspect) is a version with fairly crude castings and totally separate ports at the head end, photos attached (ignore porting which has been done to this particular manifold). The next iteration is the manifold shown in Don Zingg's photos which has pockets in the casting at the head end, perhaps to save material or perhaps to allow better stability for the manifold/head joint but still with totally separate ports at the head end, and the last, and most common, iteration adds cuts to allow a balancing passage between the ports at the head end, photos attached.
- Craig Richter
- 356 Fan
- Posts: 1305
- Joined: Thu Dec 15, 2011 9:01 pm
- Location: San Miguel de Allende/Traunkirchen
Re: '55 Intake Manifold
Alan, that's a really lousy example of porting. Just making holes match gaskets is not porting, it's turkeyizing.