Eng.case casting #’s
-
- 356 Fan
- Posts: 951
- Joined: Wed Apr 02, 2008 11:52 am
Eng.case casting #’s
Did the later as in 1964/65 Factory replacement engine cases have delete case casting #’s along with no serial # on the third piece.
Thanks Max
Thanks Max
Contact email Spyderwerks@comcast.net
-
- 356 Fan
- Posts: 951
- Joined: Wed Apr 02, 2008 11:52 am
Re: Eng.case casting #’s
Found my answer.
Unnumbered replacement blocks don't have an assembly number (casting number).
Unnumbered replacement blocks don't have an assembly number (casting number).
Contact email Spyderwerks@comcast.net
- James Davies
- 356Talk Moderator
- Posts: 2959
- Joined: Thu Aug 15, 2013 9:15 am
- Location: Heidelberg, DE
Re: Eng.case casting #’s
Yeah, the term "case casting number" should be relegated to the dustbin of inaccurate history. Porsche used the term "internal number". But yeah, you've found your answer. Only engines assembled at Porsche had this internal number.
- Vic Skirmants
- Registry Hall of Fame
- Posts: 9300
- Joined: Tue Oct 27, 2009 5:02 pm
- Location: SE Michigan
- Contact:
Re: Eng.case casting #’s
Hate the term "case casting number". Thanks a lot, Harry.James Davies wrote: ↑Mon Aug 26, 2019 7:01 am Yeah, the term "case casting number" should be relegated to the dustbin of inaccurate history. Porsche used the term "internal number". But yeah, you've found your answer. Only engines assembled at Porsche had this internal number.
-
- 356 Fan
- Posts: 152
- Joined: Sun Mar 13, 2016 9:36 pm
- Location: Canada
Re: Eng.case casting #’s
Agreed, I understand it to be an engine assembly serial #. I believe it was assigned sequentially as each engine was built, but was independent of the engine serial # that was linked to the type #. Given the difficulty of stamping the numbers in that location I assume the numbers were not stamped after the engine was completed. It is possible the assembler was given the numbers to stamp before he started, or at some point later when the basic engine was complete but before the tin was installed.
Blank cases would only have the mating numbers.
Blank cases would only have the mating numbers.
Contact by email
- Vic Skirmants
- Registry Hall of Fame
- Posts: 9300
- Joined: Tue Oct 27, 2009 5:02 pm
- Location: SE Michigan
- Contact:
Re: Eng.case casting #’s
I totally agree.David Pateman wrote: ↑Mon Aug 26, 2019 9:03 pm Agreed, I understand it to be an engine assembly serial #. I believe it was assigned sequentially as each engine was built, but was independent of the engine serial # that was linked to the type #. Given the difficulty of stamping the numbers in that location I assume the numbers were not stamped after the engine was completed. It is possible the assembler was given the numbers to stamp before he started, or at some point later when the basic engine was complete but before the tin was installed.
Blank cases would only have the mating numbers.
-
- 356 Fan
- Posts: 5
- Joined: Sun Feb 02, 2020 9:02 am
Re: Eng.case casting #’s
Has anybody seen one Where the 2 numbers at the back of the case has one number running length wise and the other number running cross the car. All 3 numbers match.
356C
356C
- Vic Skirmants
- Registry Hall of Fame
- Posts: 9300
- Joined: Tue Oct 27, 2009 5:02 pm
- Location: SE Michigan
- Contact:
Re: Eng.case casting #’s
That is very common.Brendan Collins wrote: ↑Sat Feb 22, 2020 4:03 am Has anybody seen one Where the 2 numbers at the back of the case has one number running length wise and the other number running cross the car. All 3 numbers match.
356C
-
- 356 Fan
- Posts: 5
- Joined: Sun Feb 02, 2020 9:02 am
Re: Eng.case casting #’s
Thanks Vic
-
- 356 Fan
- Posts: 5
- Joined: Sun Feb 02, 2020 9:02 am
Re: Eng.case casting #’s
Hi Vic
Slightly of topic but i am sure you will know the answer, but no matter where i look no definitive answer or topic.
When ID plates went from Reutter to Porsche in 1965.
I have seen many examples of the last production numbers from 162000 onwards that have Reutter plates.
Do you or anyone know when the change occurred and did the Reutter stock run out even after the official deal finalization in May 1964?
Slightly of topic but i am sure you will know the answer, but no matter where i look no definitive answer or topic.
When ID plates went from Reutter to Porsche in 1965.
I have seen many examples of the last production numbers from 162000 onwards that have Reutter plates.
Do you or anyone know when the change occurred and did the Reutter stock run out even after the official deal finalization in May 1964?
- Vic Skirmants
- Registry Hall of Fame
- Posts: 9300
- Joined: Tue Oct 27, 2009 5:02 pm
- Location: SE Michigan
- Contact:
Re: Eng.case casting #’s
Thanks for the vote of confidence, but I can't answer that. How about Brett Johnson?
-
- 356 Fan
- Posts: 5
- Joined: Sun Feb 02, 2020 9:02 am
Re: Eng.case casting #’s
Unfortunately his book gives no clues?
Assume somebody has gone down the path?
Appears when you look at cars for sale and sold the Reutter plate continued well into 1965
Assume somebody has gone down the path?
Appears when you look at cars for sale and sold the Reutter plate continued well into 1965
- Greg Bryan
- 356 Fan
- Posts: 3696
- Joined: Sat Oct 04, 2008 1:05 pm
- Location: San Pedro, CA 90732; Fallen Leaf, CA 96150
- Contact:
Re: Eng.case casting #’s
My 6/64 cab - 160595 - has the Porsche ID plate in the hinge cover. I’ve seen a lower number but didn’t record it.
I think I’ve heard that the change was in the 4/64 timeframe
I think I’ve heard that the change was in the 4/64 timeframe
Greg Bryan
-
- 356 Fan
- Posts: 5
- Joined: Sun Feb 02, 2020 9:02 am
Re: Eng.case casting #’s
Thanks Greg I would be keen to know what your compliance plate in front of the fuel tank looks like. In Brett Johnsons book he shows an updated Porsche plate from Reutter plate. I have never seen the Porsche plate in real life. Then again not so many 356c in Aust.