Page 7 of 9

Re: Difference between Reproduction and Original items

Posted: Thu May 26, 2016 12:15 am
by Jim Alton
Here's a photo of a reproduction on my 911:
Reproduction Hella 128 circa 1987
Reproduction Hella 128 circa 1987
And here's a used lens I got before I decided restoring the foglights was pretty much hopeless:
Used Hella 128 lens
Used Hella 128 lens
There's one marking on the "original" lens that's missing from the reproduction"

"N-25 cm/5m"

Between "oben" and "66893" above the Hella Logo. I have a broken original lens that also has the "N-25 cm/5m"

Re: Difference between Reproduction and Original items

Posted: Thu May 26, 2016 12:43 am
by Edwin Ek
Jim, your help in this has been invaluable! I am going to look at all the old and new yellow ones on ebay to see if this is true for them also. I expect it will be.

Re: Difference between Reproduction and Original items

Posted: Fri May 27, 2016 3:13 am
by Ivan Fuller
I have been obsessing about Hella 128's for some time as i tried and find what is correct for my 65 911 (1022). I guess it started when I bought a nice NOS pair thinking they would solve my problems but they only started them when research confirmed they were upside down and not for Porsche. There are various threads here and on the early 911 registry that provide some info but not one thread that clearly defines everything - which would be hard because when you get into it there are multiple changes depending on market and age - and of course these were fitted to other cars such as Mercedes BMW and sold at the corner auto parts store as accessories.
Here are some thoughts I have based upon research, what I have collected or seen online in the last 18 months.
BULBS/REFLECTORS:
1)Tungsten 35w- up to '68. bayonet bulb fitting with large bulb cover about 1 1/4" There are early and late bulb holders - early reinforced bakelite, later steel.
2)Halogen 55w - from '68 square bulb mount slot & clip, small bulb cover 3/4" All reproductions are halogen - although the reflectors are interchangeable.
3) Tinted yellow to go with clear lenses some versions - rare.
HOUSINGS:
Drain Holes
1)Triangle by mounting bolt - for mounting "upright" bolt facing down. Not for Porsche application - an accessory or for other cars. 99% of what you find in Europe, not so common US.
2)Triangle opposite mounting bolt the one we want for Porsche - for mounting "upside down/under bumper bolt facing up drain facing down. Hard to find!
3)Slot in bezel/none in housing. - Introduced about 1968 when the V was removed. Also at this time a notch appeared in the bezel that lined up with a ridge in the non V lense. This design makes the housings universal right side or upside down mounting. No reproductions have aforementioned triangle drain holes.
Bezel Mounting
1)Full ring spot welded - as per 1957 NOS
2)Full ring one rivet each side - why?
3)Clips each side spot welded - as per Jims original '65 - the housing pressing changed for this.
4)Clips each side riveted - two rivets From '68 - I'd say cheaper to manufacture than polishing spot welds and no deformed housing if screws overtightened. Aforementioned is likely evolution. All reproductions have the two rivets each side.
Material
'57 (full bezel mounting ring) are steel.
Others are brass. (cenetr earth tab/rivet)
Earth tab
The tungsten versions had an earth clip riveted inside the housing. On the the '57 lights this is riveted to the mounting plate. The others I have this is single rivet in the center opposite the mounting bolt. One set I have seen has later slotted bezels and the center rivet.
Some early housings have "Hella 66893" stamped by the mounting bolt - not common.
BEZELS:
1)Plain. Correct for Porsche up to '68
2)Slot for drain & notch. Correct for Porsche from '68
3)Hella Logo raised on top - does not appear on early Porsche 911 brochure. Most used original from Europe have this. I think its really cool - my two sets of 57 date stamped have it. Maybe its an early thing?Easily removed if rechroming...These bezels also have n=25cm/5m stamped in.
LENSES:
Where do you start?
1)Yellow = Europe. Clear = US. Seen plenty of clear ones in Europe. All versions of lenses seem to come in both colors.
2)Yellow coated glass inside - can be removed to make clear - original? Yellow tinted glass - reproduction?
My theory is that that as the lenses evolved more script/compliance codes were added.
1) '57. Early Hella logo (In 1958 Hella changed their logo. The H of Hella formerly enclosed to the left changed to open. The later logo is flat on the ends and taller, the the early is oval on ends). There is squiggle /\/\/\/ at the base of the V - (German compliance?) Only other script is 3/32" tall and hard to find read - OBEN at top 66893 at bottom. NOTHING else!
2) Next reference I have is 1965 911 brochure. This has what I call the crown logo - I have seeen two versions. As expected the Hella logo is now open by the H. By this time more of the script we see on later lenses has arrived: Made In Germany. A. 66893 large script.n=25cm/5m.
3) More compliance script got added around the perimeter: IGM2042PM. SAE F64. /\/\/\ K1112. 11-60893. Don't know the timing but I have seen various combinations of some all. Obviously open H Hella logo. The current reproductions have everything but without n=25cm/5m.
4) 1968! For some reason the V was done away and straight bar introduced along with the many changes made as mentioned above notably halogen bulbs and two rivets on sides. Within a couple of years the V was back in the parts books so you got all the changes with V lenses - this being the last of the evolution appears to be what todays reproductions are based on. There are some some excellent quality out there and they are really the only practical solution. Are they totally correct for a 356 or pre '68 911..... not really (although most are not as anal as me)
It took me more than a year to find the parts for what I believe to be correct for my 65. I have to tool up to do the rivets, remove dents, rechrome, replate mounting bolts resilver reflectors. By the time I count my time it'll be 5-10 times the repros.
So to conclude there are perhaps something like 8/10 versions of lenses, 8 versions of housings, 3 or 4 versions of bezels.
PHEW - confused yet.
Any input confirming or denying particulary with reference to date codes on the reflectors really appreciated. Guess it needs its own thread with pictures and tables - maybe one day :)

Re: Difference between Reproduction and Original items

Posted: Sun May 29, 2016 8:54 pm
by Edwin Ek
Ivan,

WOW! You have been digging into the details. This is invaluable.

Eric Linden, appearing above in this thread, made a post on the Early S website saying that yellow lenses were for the B cars and clear lenses with yellow coating were for the C cars and later.

Re: Difference between Reproduction and Original items

Posted: Thu Jun 23, 2016 9:39 pm
by Edwin Ek
Ivan, have you seen yellow lenses with the crown logo?

Re: Difference between Reproduction and Original items

Posted: Sat Jun 25, 2016 7:19 pm
by Peter Bartelli
What Eric L meant to say was the 356B T6 Accessories booklet shows item 9121 as Fog Lights with yellow reflector.

Re: Difference between Reproduction and Original items

Posted: Fri Jul 01, 2016 11:59 am
by Ivan Fuller
Edwin, yes I have yellow crown logo lenses.
sorry never figured out how to post pics.

Re: Difference between Reproduction and Original items

Posted: Fri Jul 01, 2016 1:19 pm
by Chuck House
Ivan,

That is quite some research! Love it. I have an unrestored '65 911 (1318) with its original Hellas if you need additional confirmation on what is correct for your car - clear lenses with yellow reflectors. If so, send me a message offline.

Re: Difference between Reproduction and Original items

Posted: Fri Jul 01, 2016 2:06 pm
by Edwin Ek
Ivan Fuller wrote:Edwin, yes I have yellow crown logo lenses.
sorry never figured out how to post pics.
Ivan, would like to get in touch, but there is no email address in your profile. Shoot me a message if you'd like. Thanks.

Re: Difference between Reproduction and Original items

Posted: Thu Jul 21, 2016 12:04 am
by Ivan Fuller
Edwin did you get my message?
Chuck I'd like to touch base offline - not sure how to get a hold of you - registry contact didnt work. I am sure there are some invaluable details on your car that will be helpful as I start resto on my 1022. Please send me mail.

I have updated my profile to receive email from the site - not sure why it wasnt enabled.

Re: Difference between Reproduction and Original items

Posted: Wed Jul 27, 2016 5:49 pm
by Dick Roth
I have more repro parts in my body then I had on my Speedster (none)...I wonder if I would still be running without them...

Re: Difference between Reproduction and Original items

Posted: Wed Jul 27, 2016 7:08 pm
by Peter Bartelli
You and me both Dick!

Re: Difference between Reproduction and Original items

Posted: Thu Jul 28, 2016 12:14 am
by Dick Roth
Thanks for the kind comment from my old and dear friend, and great 356 man Pete Bartelli...We're still running, Pete...

Difference between Reproduction Klein Screwdrivers & Origina

Posted: Fri Sep 08, 2017 11:44 am
by Dave Erickson
Stoddards is now selling Klein red-handled screwdrivers that appear to be good matches for the originals. I hope someone has a pair of these and can post some photos of them along with the originals.

Re: Difference between Reproduction and Original items

Posted: Fri Sep 08, 2017 12:21 pm
by Edwin Ek
Something I learned in my adventures to buy real GT seats for my car: original steel shells (don't know about aluminum ones) have little triangular metal tangs around the circumference whose purpose is to provide an anchor for the vinyl or leather. The reproductions don't have these tangs.

I should add that I am aware of one person who makes reproduction shells with tangs. My sense is that he makes these on an individualized basis.

I still don't know for sure if Speedster shells are different than GT shells. The upholstery is.