Difference between Reproduction and Original items

For those who obsess about exactly how their 356 left the factory!
Post Reply
Message
Author
User avatar
Jim Alton
356 Fan
Posts: 1772
Joined: Sun Mar 30, 2008 12:11 pm
Location: Los Angeles County

Re: Difference between Reproduction and Original items

#91 Post by Jim Alton »

Here's a photo of a reproduction on my 911:
Reproduction Hella 128 circa 1987
Reproduction Hella 128 circa 1987
And here's a used lens I got before I decided restoring the foglights was pretty much hopeless:
Used Hella 128 lens
Used Hella 128 lens
There's one marking on the "original" lens that's missing from the reproduction"

"N-25 cm/5m"

Between "oben" and "66893" above the Hella Logo. I have a broken original lens that also has the "N-25 cm/5m"
 
Jim Alton
Los Angeles County, CA
1958 Porsche 356A Cabriolet
1965 Porsche 911 Coupé
1966 Volkswagen Type 2
2003 Porsche 986 Boxster

Edwin Ek
356 Fan
Posts: 1898
Joined: Sat Jun 21, 2008 11:16 am
Location: Santa Monica, CA

Re: Difference between Reproduction and Original items

#92 Post by Edwin Ek »

Jim, your help in this has been invaluable! I am going to look at all the old and new yellow ones on ebay to see if this is true for them also. I expect it will be.
#6386

Ivan Fuller
356 Fan
Posts: 109
Joined: Thu Aug 06, 2009 3:52 am
Contact:

Re: Difference between Reproduction and Original items

#93 Post by Ivan Fuller »

I have been obsessing about Hella 128's for some time as i tried and find what is correct for my 65 911 (1022). I guess it started when I bought a nice NOS pair thinking they would solve my problems but they only started them when research confirmed they were upside down and not for Porsche. There are various threads here and on the early 911 registry that provide some info but not one thread that clearly defines everything - which would be hard because when you get into it there are multiple changes depending on market and age - and of course these were fitted to other cars such as Mercedes BMW and sold at the corner auto parts store as accessories.
Here are some thoughts I have based upon research, what I have collected or seen online in the last 18 months.
BULBS/REFLECTORS:
1)Tungsten 35w- up to '68. bayonet bulb fitting with large bulb cover about 1 1/4" There are early and late bulb holders - early reinforced bakelite, later steel.
2)Halogen 55w - from '68 square bulb mount slot & clip, small bulb cover 3/4" All reproductions are halogen - although the reflectors are interchangeable.
3) Tinted yellow to go with clear lenses some versions - rare.
HOUSINGS:
Drain Holes
1)Triangle by mounting bolt - for mounting "upright" bolt facing down. Not for Porsche application - an accessory or for other cars. 99% of what you find in Europe, not so common US.
2)Triangle opposite mounting bolt the one we want for Porsche - for mounting "upside down/under bumper bolt facing up drain facing down. Hard to find!
3)Slot in bezel/none in housing. - Introduced about 1968 when the V was removed. Also at this time a notch appeared in the bezel that lined up with a ridge in the non V lense. This design makes the housings universal right side or upside down mounting. No reproductions have aforementioned triangle drain holes.
Bezel Mounting
1)Full ring spot welded - as per 1957 NOS
2)Full ring one rivet each side - why?
3)Clips each side spot welded - as per Jims original '65 - the housing pressing changed for this.
4)Clips each side riveted - two rivets From '68 - I'd say cheaper to manufacture than polishing spot welds and no deformed housing if screws overtightened. Aforementioned is likely evolution. All reproductions have the two rivets each side.
Material
'57 (full bezel mounting ring) are steel.
Others are brass. (cenetr earth tab/rivet)
Earth tab
The tungsten versions had an earth clip riveted inside the housing. On the the '57 lights this is riveted to the mounting plate. The others I have this is single rivet in the center opposite the mounting bolt. One set I have seen has later slotted bezels and the center rivet.
Some early housings have "Hella 66893" stamped by the mounting bolt - not common.
BEZELS:
1)Plain. Correct for Porsche up to '68
2)Slot for drain & notch. Correct for Porsche from '68
3)Hella Logo raised on top - does not appear on early Porsche 911 brochure. Most used original from Europe have this. I think its really cool - my two sets of 57 date stamped have it. Maybe its an early thing?Easily removed if rechroming...These bezels also have n=25cm/5m stamped in.
LENSES:
Where do you start?
1)Yellow = Europe. Clear = US. Seen plenty of clear ones in Europe. All versions of lenses seem to come in both colors.
2)Yellow coated glass inside - can be removed to make clear - original? Yellow tinted glass - reproduction?
My theory is that that as the lenses evolved more script/compliance codes were added.
1) '57. Early Hella logo (In 1958 Hella changed their logo. The H of Hella formerly enclosed to the left changed to open. The later logo is flat on the ends and taller, the the early is oval on ends). There is squiggle /\/\/\/ at the base of the V - (German compliance?) Only other script is 3/32" tall and hard to find read - OBEN at top 66893 at bottom. NOTHING else!
2) Next reference I have is 1965 911 brochure. This has what I call the crown logo - I have seeen two versions. As expected the Hella logo is now open by the H. By this time more of the script we see on later lenses has arrived: Made In Germany. A. 66893 large script.n=25cm/5m.
3) More compliance script got added around the perimeter: IGM2042PM. SAE F64. /\/\/\ K1112. 11-60893. Don't know the timing but I have seen various combinations of some all. Obviously open H Hella logo. The current reproductions have everything but without n=25cm/5m.
4) 1968! For some reason the V was done away and straight bar introduced along with the many changes made as mentioned above notably halogen bulbs and two rivets on sides. Within a couple of years the V was back in the parts books so you got all the changes with V lenses - this being the last of the evolution appears to be what todays reproductions are based on. There are some some excellent quality out there and they are really the only practical solution. Are they totally correct for a 356 or pre '68 911..... not really (although most are not as anal as me)
It took me more than a year to find the parts for what I believe to be correct for my 65. I have to tool up to do the rivets, remove dents, rechrome, replate mounting bolts resilver reflectors. By the time I count my time it'll be 5-10 times the repros.
So to conclude there are perhaps something like 8/10 versions of lenses, 8 versions of housings, 3 or 4 versions of bezels.
PHEW - confused yet.
Any input confirming or denying particulary with reference to date codes on the reflectors really appreciated. Guess it needs its own thread with pictures and tables - maybe one day :)
'58 Speedster
'65 911
revivem.co.nz

Edwin Ek
356 Fan
Posts: 1898
Joined: Sat Jun 21, 2008 11:16 am
Location: Santa Monica, CA

Re: Difference between Reproduction and Original items

#94 Post by Edwin Ek »

Ivan,

WOW! You have been digging into the details. This is invaluable.

Eric Linden, appearing above in this thread, made a post on the Early S website saying that yellow lenses were for the B cars and clear lenses with yellow coating were for the C cars and later.
#6386

Edwin Ek
356 Fan
Posts: 1898
Joined: Sat Jun 21, 2008 11:16 am
Location: Santa Monica, CA

Re: Difference between Reproduction and Original items

#95 Post by Edwin Ek »

Ivan, have you seen yellow lenses with the crown logo?
#6386

User avatar
Peter Bartelli
356 Fan
Posts: 250
Joined: Mon Nov 24, 2008 7:19 pm
Tag: Captain
Location: Sarasota County, Florida

Re: Difference between Reproduction and Original items

#96 Post by Peter Bartelli »

What Eric L meant to say was the 356B T6 Accessories booklet shows item 9121 as Fog Lights with yellow reflector.

Ivan Fuller
356 Fan
Posts: 109
Joined: Thu Aug 06, 2009 3:52 am
Contact:

Re: Difference between Reproduction and Original items

#97 Post by Ivan Fuller »

Edwin, yes I have yellow crown logo lenses.
sorry never figured out how to post pics.
'58 Speedster
'65 911
revivem.co.nz

User avatar
Chuck House
Registry Hall of Fame
Posts: 728
Joined: Wed Mar 19, 2008 3:26 pm

Re: Difference between Reproduction and Original items

#98 Post by Chuck House »

Ivan,

That is quite some research! Love it. I have an unrestored '65 911 (1318) with its original Hellas if you need additional confirmation on what is correct for your car - clear lenses with yellow reflectors. If so, send me a message offline.
Chuck House
Southern California

Edwin Ek
356 Fan
Posts: 1898
Joined: Sat Jun 21, 2008 11:16 am
Location: Santa Monica, CA

Re: Difference between Reproduction and Original items

#99 Post by Edwin Ek »

Ivan Fuller wrote:Edwin, yes I have yellow crown logo lenses.
sorry never figured out how to post pics.
Ivan, would like to get in touch, but there is no email address in your profile. Shoot me a message if you'd like. Thanks.
#6386

Ivan Fuller
356 Fan
Posts: 109
Joined: Thu Aug 06, 2009 3:52 am
Contact:

Re: Difference between Reproduction and Original items

#100 Post by Ivan Fuller »

Edwin did you get my message?
Chuck I'd like to touch base offline - not sure how to get a hold of you - registry contact didnt work. I am sure there are some invaluable details on your car that will be helpful as I start resto on my 1022. Please send me mail.

I have updated my profile to receive email from the site - not sure why it wasnt enabled.
'58 Speedster
'65 911
revivem.co.nz

Dick Roth
356 Fan
Posts: 350
Joined: Tue Jul 14, 2009 4:01 pm
Location: NYC, Amagansett, NY

Re: Difference between Reproduction and Original items

#101 Post by Dick Roth »

I have more repro parts in my body then I had on my Speedster (none)...I wonder if I would still be running without them...

User avatar
Peter Bartelli
356 Fan
Posts: 250
Joined: Mon Nov 24, 2008 7:19 pm
Tag: Captain
Location: Sarasota County, Florida

Re: Difference between Reproduction and Original items

#102 Post by Peter Bartelli »

You and me both Dick!

Dick Roth
356 Fan
Posts: 350
Joined: Tue Jul 14, 2009 4:01 pm
Location: NYC, Amagansett, NY

Re: Difference between Reproduction and Original items

#103 Post by Dick Roth »

Thanks for the kind comment from my old and dear friend, and great 356 man Pete Bartelli...We're still running, Pete...

Dave Erickson
356 Fan
Posts: 2189
Joined: Sat Oct 26, 2013 9:34 pm
Location: Monterey, CA

Difference between Reproduction Klein Screwdrivers & Origina

#104 Post by Dave Erickson »

Stoddards is now selling Klein red-handled screwdrivers that appear to be good matches for the originals. I hope someone has a pair of these and can post some photos of them along with the originals.

Edwin Ek
356 Fan
Posts: 1898
Joined: Sat Jun 21, 2008 11:16 am
Location: Santa Monica, CA

Re: Difference between Reproduction and Original items

#105 Post by Edwin Ek »

Something I learned in my adventures to buy real GT seats for my car: original steel shells (don't know about aluminum ones) have little triangular metal tangs around the circumference whose purpose is to provide an anchor for the vinyl or leather. The reproductions don't have these tangs.

I should add that I am aware of one person who makes reproduction shells with tangs. My sense is that he makes these on an individualized basis.

I still don't know for sure if Speedster shells are different than GT shells. The upholstery is.
#6386

Post Reply