Type 64, Porsche or not a Porsche?

356 Porsche-related discussions and questions.
Post Reply
Message
Author
Jeffrey Leeds
356 Fan
Posts: 1280
Joined: Sun Apr 20, 2008 4:57 pm
Location: Northeastern MA

Re: Type 64, Porsche or not a Porsche?

#16 Post by Jeffrey Leeds »

Vic Skirmants wrote: Sun Aug 18, 2019 7:15 am I'm finally putting in my opinion on this car. It is Porsche design #64. It is a Volkswagen KDF chassis with a special body. Known for decades as a VW 60K10; Type 60 with special Karrossserrie (sp?) Number 10. Porsche did build it. They also built many of the prototype VW KDF Wagens; that does not make them Porsches.
Case Closed
< Jeff >

Registry Member Since 1978
1963 356B T-6 Super 90 Coupe
2009 997.2 Carrera S
2015 958 Cayenne diesel-1 & 2015 958 Cayenne diesel-2

User avatar
C J Murray
356 Fan
Posts: 9236
Joined: Fri Oct 23, 2009 7:24 pm
Location: 30MI WEST OF PHILA
Contact:

Re: Type 64, Porsche or not a Porsche?

#17 Post by C J Murray »

Good thing Emory didn't build it. :shock:
'57 Speedster
'59 Sunroof
'60 Devin D Porsche Race Car
'63 Cabriolet "Norm"
'67 911 S Original Owner
'03 Ferrari 575M
'09 Smart Passion

User avatar
Sebastian Gaeta
356 Fan
Posts: 3060
Joined: Tue Mar 25, 2008 5:50 pm
Location: Ann Arbor, MI

Re: Type 64, Porsche or not a Porsche?

#18 Post by Sebastian Gaeta »

Adam Wright wrote: Sun Aug 18, 2019 6:28 am Apparently, the RM theatrics didn't play well with the crowd with actual bidding stalling at $17,000, which apparently didn't work for the seller.

https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles ... on-blunder
It appears to me that the bidding didn't "stall" at all, it looks like there was not even one real bid. It was a "chandelier" bid as they say....

Very cool car with cool history, WAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAY too much hype.
Sebastian Gaeta
www.arbormotion.com

Registry #8339

'65 C coupe
'64 C cab

-------
2014 Boxster 981
2005 997 C2 Cab
1967 Karmann Ghia Convertible
1966 VW Single Cab
1966 Ducati Cafe Racer
1964 Karmann Ghia Coupe
1963 Beetle

User avatar
Bil Brown
356 Fan
Posts: 907
Joined: Thu Mar 27, 2008 12:36 pm
Location: Lincoln, NE

Re: Type 64, Porsche or not a Porsche?

#19 Post by Bil Brown »

if ever there was a car to be in THE museum.....I would think this would be it!......they`re sure stubborn about not buying it.
Bill Brown

User avatar
Christian Guthrie
356 Fan
Posts: 569
Joined: Wed Mar 26, 2008 8:51 am
Tag: How many is enough?
Location: Phoenix, AZ

Re: Type 64, Porsche or not a Porsche?

#20 Post by Christian Guthrie »

Sebastian Gaeta wrote: Sun Aug 18, 2019 2:23 pm
Adam Wright wrote: Sun Aug 18, 2019 6:28 am Apparently, the RM theatrics didn't play well with the crowd with actual bidding stalling at $17,000, which apparently didn't work for the seller.

https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles ... on-blunder
It appears to me that the bidding didn't "stall" at all, it looks like there was not even one real bid. It was a "chandelier" bid as they say....

Very cool car with cool history, WAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAY too much hype.
Agreed. When you need a 20 minute plus video on someone explaining why the car is so cool, you're really reaching in my opinion. If it had sold at 17 million, it would have been the most expensive VW in history.
 

User avatar
Sebastian Gaeta
356 Fan
Posts: 3060
Joined: Tue Mar 25, 2008 5:50 pm
Location: Ann Arbor, MI

Re: Type 64, Porsche or not a Porsche?

#21 Post by Sebastian Gaeta »

Vic Skirmants wrote: Sun Aug 18, 2019 7:15 am I'm finally putting in my opinion on this car. It is Porsche design #64. It is a Volkswagen KDF chassis with a special body. Known for decades as a VW 60K10; Type 60 with special Karrossserrie (sp?) Number 10. Porsche did build it. They also built many of the prototype VW KDF Wagens; that does not make them Porsches.

Yup, has always been referred to as a VW or KdF by real historians (Ludvigsen etc).

Even the car that Porsche themselves have always called the first car - the #1 Roadster - is questionably the first Porsche. I mean, the engineering drawings refer to it as a "VW Sport Roadster". Anyone who has read Excellence was Expected knows that Ferry built that car to take to VW so they could pitch it as a sports car for the VW line. The Porsche firm wanted another royalty deal like they did with the Beetle. When Heinz Nordhoff rejected the idea they went home and eventually put the Porsche name on the nose. When they decided to build the Gmund prototypes an entirely new design was created so they could be produced by hand in Gmund, the original Roadster design was not conducive to their "factory". Haven't you ever wondered why the "#1" car is so different from the 356/2 cars? That's why, because it was never considered for production by Porsche themselves. Even this story is so muddled so how could a car built a decade earlier, the VW 60k10, be considered the first car. Too. much. hype.
Last edited by Sebastian Gaeta on Sun Aug 18, 2019 4:30 pm, edited 2 times in total.
Sebastian Gaeta
www.arbormotion.com

Registry #8339

'65 C coupe
'64 C cab

-------
2014 Boxster 981
2005 997 C2 Cab
1967 Karmann Ghia Convertible
1966 VW Single Cab
1966 Ducati Cafe Racer
1964 Karmann Ghia Coupe
1963 Beetle

User avatar
Emil Wojcik
356 Fan
Posts: 1528
Joined: Tue Mar 25, 2008 7:20 pm
Location: Metuchen, NJ

Re: Type 64, Porsche or not a Porsche?

#22 Post by Emil Wojcik »

Since it was built before Porsche went into business for himself under his own name, it is definitely not a Porsche. If you consider it a Porsche just because of Dr Porsche's involvement, that has to mean the VW Beetle is also a Porsche.

Having said that, I'd trade my 356 for this Type 64 any day.
Emil Wojcik
'64 356C Euro coupe
'78 MGB
'86 Jaguar XJ6 Series 3
'94 MB E420

User avatar
Sebastian Gaeta
356 Fan
Posts: 3060
Joined: Tue Mar 25, 2008 5:50 pm
Location: Ann Arbor, MI

Re: Type 64, Porsche or not a Porsche?

#23 Post by Sebastian Gaeta »

Emil Wojcik wrote: Sun Aug 18, 2019 2:46 pm Since it was built before Porsche went into business for himself under his own name, it is definitely not a Porsche. If you consider it a Porsche just because of Dr Porsche's involvement, that has to mean the VW Beetle is also a Porsche.

Having said that, I'd trade my 356 for this Type 64 any day.
Emil,

Ferdinand (Professor Porsche) founded his company, Dr. Ing. h.c. F. Porsche GmbH, in 1931 as an engineering and consultancy firm. His son Ferry (Doctor Porsche) and Ferry's sister Louise founded Porsche Konstruktionen GesmbH in 1947 to manufacture vehicles. So, per usual the story is muddy. The Porsche design firm existed but the manufacturing company did not. Interpretation is always up to whomever reads the story.
Sebastian Gaeta
www.arbormotion.com

Registry #8339

'65 C coupe
'64 C cab

-------
2014 Boxster 981
2005 997 C2 Cab
1967 Karmann Ghia Convertible
1966 VW Single Cab
1966 Ducati Cafe Racer
1964 Karmann Ghia Coupe
1963 Beetle

User avatar
Nick Daffern
356 Fan
Posts: 170
Joined: Wed Mar 26, 2008 3:06 pm
Location: WA

Re: Type 64, Porsche or not a Porsche?

#24 Post by Nick Daffern »

"Sometime in 1948/49 Ferry Porsche had the lettering P-O-R-S-C-H-E made up in the now familiar wider-than-tall style, which was then fitted to the nose just below the front trunk opening." I think I'll defer to Ferry's judgement as to whether or not the Typ 64 should be regarded as a Porsche.

The proportions of the car certainly seem to portend the design of the 356. YMMV

User avatar
C J Murray
356 Fan
Posts: 9236
Joined: Fri Oct 23, 2009 7:24 pm
Location: 30MI WEST OF PHILA
Contact:

Re: Type 64, Porsche or not a Porsche?

#25 Post by C J Murray »

According to some the Egger-Lohner of 1898, named "P1" by Dr. Porsche, is the first Porsche. What about the MB SS? Auto-Union GP cars? Tanks?

The first Porsche is the car they built at Gmund when they formed their own car manufacturing company to sell cars with their name badge. Previously they were engineering consultants for other brands.

Remember when Porsche hired Toyota executives as consultants and they saved the company from bankruptcy? The cars built after that are not Toyotas.
'57 Speedster
'59 Sunroof
'60 Devin D Porsche Race Car
'63 Cabriolet "Norm"
'67 911 S Original Owner
'03 Ferrari 575M
'09 Smart Passion

User avatar
Sebastian Gaeta
356 Fan
Posts: 3060
Joined: Tue Mar 25, 2008 5:50 pm
Location: Ann Arbor, MI

Re: Type 64, Porsche or not a Porsche?

#26 Post by Sebastian Gaeta »

Nick Daffern wrote: Mon Aug 19, 2019 1:30 am "Sometime in 1948/49 Ferry Porsche had the lettering P-O-R-S-C-H-E made up in the now familiar wider-than-tall style, which was then fitted to the nose just below the front trunk opening." I think I'll defer to Ferry's judgement as to whether or not the Typ 64 should be regarded as a Porsche.

The proportions of the car certainly seem to portend the design of the 356. YMMV
That’s why this whole thing is so muddy. I don’t recall, however, Ferry ever calling it a Porsche and when Ludvigsen first published Excellence was Expected he had full access to Ferry, company employees and company archives and the car is referred to in the book simply as The Type 64 or 60K10. Ludvigsen also discusses how the car was to be a platform to show the public what could be done with the KdF Wagen as a propaganda tool. Nowhere is it called a Porsche and Ferry never did either. Yes, he put his name on it some ten years later, but the car has been for sale before and the factory hasn't purchased it, instead they made a replica. In the placard at the factory museum it is not referred to as a "Porsche".

Again, very cool car, it's just not what the auction house and some people want it to be.
Sebastian Gaeta
www.arbormotion.com

Registry #8339

'65 C coupe
'64 C cab

-------
2014 Boxster 981
2005 997 C2 Cab
1967 Karmann Ghia Convertible
1966 VW Single Cab
1966 Ducati Cafe Racer
1964 Karmann Ghia Coupe
1963 Beetle

User avatar
Jay Broemmel
356 Fan
Posts: 316
Joined: Tue Jun 03, 2008 1:12 am
Location: San Francisco, CA
Instagram: @slouchcycles

Re: Type 64, Porsche or not a Porsche?

#27 Post by Jay Broemmel »

A few people sent me links to this story. One was this gem. https://www.theguardian.com/business/20 ... ys-auction
Big chunks of it are lifted directly from the Bloomberg article, but it also contains this:
War broke out before the Berlin-Rome race could be held, so Porsche, a member of the Nazi party and the SS who was later imprisoned, used the Type 64 as his daily driver. :shock:
I know the Professor’s wartime history has been sanitized a bit, but the SS seems a bit of a stretch. Anyone know any actual facts about that? J

User avatar
Emil Wojcik
356 Fan
Posts: 1528
Joined: Tue Mar 25, 2008 7:20 pm
Location: Metuchen, NJ

Re: Type 64, Porsche or not a Porsche?

#28 Post by Emil Wojcik »

I remember reading there was some sort of link to the SS but I have no idea if it's true.
Emil Wojcik
'64 356C Euro coupe
'78 MGB
'86 Jaguar XJ6 Series 3
'94 MB E420

User avatar
Adam Wright
Classifieds Monitor
Posts: 10322
Joined: Wed Mar 12, 2008 1:00 am
Tag: KTF

Re: Type 64, Porsche or not a Porsche?

#29 Post by Adam Wright »

Jay Broemmel wrote: Mon Aug 19, 2019 2:56 pm A few people sent me links to this story. One was this gem. https://www.theguardian.com/business/20 ... ys-auction
Big chunks of it are lifted directly from the Bloomberg article, but it also contains this:
War broke out before the Berlin-Rome race could be held, so Porsche, a member of the Nazi party and the SS who was later imprisoned, used the Type 64 as his daily driver. :shock:
I know the Professor’s wartime history has been sanitized a bit, but the SS seems a bit of a stretch. Anyone know any actual facts about that? J
I've never heard about any of the Porsche family being SS, I know the Baron had them as a racing sponsor.
Attachments
photo 2.JPG
photo 2.JPG (46.6 KiB) Viewed 886 times
photo 1.JPG
photo 1.JPG (95.45 KiB) Viewed 886 times
www.unobtanium-inc.com
Check out my Barn Find column in the Registry magazine, always looking for good stories.

User avatar
David Jones
Classifieds Moderator
Posts: 7342
Joined: Tue Mar 25, 2008 6:32 pm
Tag: I wish I knew as much as I think I know.
Location: Kentucky

Re: Type 64, Porsche or not a Porsche?

#30 Post by David Jones »

Lifted from Wikipedia.
Since being engaged by the National-Socialist authorities in building the Volksauto, Porsche was praised as the Great German Engineer.[3] Hitler considered Czechs subhuman[9] and Porsche was in 1934 urged to apply for German citizenship.[3] A few days later, Porsche indeed filed a declaration giving up the Czechoslovak citizenship at a Czechoslovak consulate in Stuttgart.[16] In 1937, Porsche joined the National Socialist German Workers' Party[17] (becoming member no. 5,643,287[18]) as well as the SS.[19] By 1938, Porsche was using the SS as security members and drivers at his factory, and later set up a special unit called SS Sturmwerk Volkswagen.[18] In 1942, Porsche reached the rank of SS-Oberführer.[20] During the war, Porsche was further decorated with the SS-Ehrenring and awarded the War Merit Cross.[21] As the war progressed his proposed solutions to new developments became more complex and Ferdinand Porsche gained a reputation in certain circles as a "mad scientist" especially with Albert Speer (mainly due to his new found affinity for "pointy" designs).[22]
If I had known I would live this long I would have pushed the envelope a little harder.
Cymru am byth
David Jones #9715

Post Reply