Zenith Main Jet: Design and Nomenclature

356 Porsche-related discussions and questions.
Post Reply
Message
Author
User avatar
Brian R Adams
356 Fan
Posts: 3348
Joined: Thu Mar 27, 2008 1:34 pm
Location: N. Nevada

Zenith Main Jet: Design and Nomenclature

#1 Post by Brian R Adams »

Question about Zenith Main Jets: My jets, marked "122", have an orifice at each end: The large hole at the screwdriver slot end measures nominally 122 (actually 0.119" to 0.120" in my set of 4) but hole in the other end measures only 0.047" across the set. I consider the large orifice to be the inlet from the fuel well, and the small orifice to be the outlet jet. So, why are these main jets specified as "122" rather than "47"? Wouldn't the smaller hole do the metering?

Brian
Welcome to the era of policy-based evidence-making.

Difficile est saturam non scribere (Juvenal)

User avatar
Ron LaDow
356 Fan
Posts: 8100
Joined: Wed Mar 26, 2008 11:45 am
Location: San Francisco

Re: Zenith Main Jet: Design and Nomenclature

#2 Post by Ron LaDow »

.47" is pretty close to 1.22mm (from memory) and they are spec'd in metric; sounds right to me.
Ron LaDow
www.precisionmatters.biz

User avatar
Brian R Adams
356 Fan
Posts: 3348
Joined: Thu Mar 27, 2008 1:34 pm
Location: N. Nevada

Re: Zenith Main Jet: Design and Nomenclature

#3 Post by Brian R Adams »

Ron LaDow wrote: Sun May 05, 2019 7:29 pm .47" is pretty close to 1.22mm (from memory) and they are spec'd in metric; sounds right to me.
Oops. Been a while. Metric, huh? :shock:

Never mind.

Thanks!
Welcome to the era of policy-based evidence-making.

Difficile est saturam non scribere (Juvenal)

User avatar
Brian R Adams
356 Fan
Posts: 3348
Joined: Thu Mar 27, 2008 1:34 pm
Location: N. Nevada

Re: Zenith Main Jet: Design and Nomenclature

#4 Post by Brian R Adams »

So using standard (non-metric) pin gages, "minus" type (each gage is 0.0002" below nominal) in 0.001" increments as go/no-go gages, my "122" mains will readily accept the 0.047 but not the 0.048. The 0.047 is 1.190mm, and the 0.048 is 1.215mm. So the "122" is probably closer to a 121 or 120. Another way to look at it is to call it 0.0475" which is 1.2065mm or rounded to 1.21mm. Precision is elusive.
-
Welcome to the era of policy-based evidence-making.

Difficile est saturam non scribere (Juvenal)

User avatar
Harlan Halsey
356 Fan
Posts: 2375
Joined: Fri Mar 02, 2012 2:05 pm
Location: No Cal SF Peninsula

Re: Zenith Main Jet: Design and Nomenclature

#5 Post by Harlan Halsey »

The flow through a jet is complex, depending on inlet, length, and outlet. The minimum diameter is not definitive. Back when the world was young, we just went by the number, bigger, more, smaller less. In the steps available. But now, after the racers have been drilling them out, or soldering them up, and with current QC, it may not be so easy.
I recall that Bruce Smith published an article on measuring jet flow in gasoline with a simple rig, not too long ago-probably in the Registry. If you really want to know what is what, I'd check out that article.

User avatar
Alan Hall
356 Fan
Posts: 1462
Joined: Wed Mar 26, 2008 12:06 pm
Location: Orinda, CA

Re: Zenith Main Jet: Design and Nomenclature

#6 Post by Alan Hall »

Harlan is correct. The flow is dependent on size and inlet shape and surface finish etc. I recall that the carb companies checked each jet on a flow rig to determine sizing, which is why you can't just use size measurements directly. However, measuring the size does let you know if the jet has been drilled out by someone in the past.

Post Reply