New Transmission Mounts

356 Porsche-related discussions and questions.
Message
Author
E Rutherford
356 Fan
Posts: 348
Joined: Tue Oct 26, 2010 2:21 pm

New Transmission Mounts

#1 Post by E Rutherford »

This is a FYI "service bulletin" for the installation of the hoop transmission mounts. I have sold more of these to customers than I have installed, but I have installed my share. They have been coming from the same source for years. This year I have run into a problem with the bell housing studs being to long. The first time this happened it caused the engine installation an extra hour (slow to recognize the issue!). Made a mental note of it and installed a new set this week in another car. Checked it with my little straight edge BEFORE installing the engine, sure enough studs were about 3-4m to long. Fixed the problem by grinding them down. Engine went in like butter.

Not sure why this is occurring this year, but it is now SOP to check them before the engine goes in. Hopefully this info will save someone some grief when they are installation the mounts.

ed
klasse356.com
Attachments
IMG_2710.JPG
IMG_2707.JPG

User avatar
Harold Singh
356 Fan
Posts: 483
Joined: Sat Sep 27, 2014 10:43 am
Tag: Cooling with air
Location: Richmond, VA

Re: New Transmission Mounts

#2 Post by Harold Singh »

I just did hoop mounts on my C and they worked fine. No issues. Felt much improved and I used the Stoddard parts. There was a cheaper set available by a significant amount. It was from Sierra Madre but I went with the stoddard version. What mounts are you having issues with normally?
Last edited by Harold Singh on Sat Nov 18, 2017 5:10 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Harold
In the garage:
1964 356C Irish Green
1995 993 GP White

User avatar
Doug McDonnell
356 Fan
Posts: 6084
Joined: Sat Apr 05, 2008 8:21 am
Location: Augusta,Michigan

Re: New Transmission Mounts

#3 Post by Doug McDonnell »

Thanks for the alert. Now if someone would make the trans mount the same thickness as they were originally. Lots of old threads discuss that the currently available ones are not the same size as originals.
1965 356C 2000 BMW 740i Sport 1967 Honda CL77 There is never enough time to do it right, but always enough time to do it over.

E Rutherford
356 Fan
Posts: 348
Joined: Tue Oct 26, 2010 2:21 pm

Re: New Transmission Mounts

#4 Post by E Rutherford »

Harold,
I buy from the same vendor that Stoddard buys from. This issue has not always been the case, just recently. Could be just a bad run?

The point of "FYI" was for anyone, regardless of where the parts came from, to "evaluate" first, then install. Makes for good habits and a lot less grief when working on our beloved cars.

ed
klasse356

User avatar
Harold Singh
356 Fan
Posts: 483
Joined: Sat Sep 27, 2014 10:43 am
Tag: Cooling with air
Location: Richmond, VA

Re: New Transmission Mounts

#5 Post by Harold Singh »

E Rutherford wrote:Harold,
I buy from the same vendor that Stoddard buys from. This issue has not always been the case, just recently. Could be just a bad run?

The point of "FYI" was for anyone, regardless of where the parts came from, to "evaluate" first, then install. Makes for good habits and a lot less grief when working on our beloved cars.

ed
klasse356
Ed, good point. About how much are you normally having to take off? By that, I wonder if you have before and after measurements. 3-4mm or more seems like a lot! Although in the photos it looks like a good chunk is being ground away.

Thanks for the heads up,

Harold
Harold
In the garage:
1964 356C Irish Green
1995 993 GP White

User avatar
Wil Mittelbach
356 Fan
Posts: 1019
Joined: Sun Apr 13, 2008 8:58 pm
Location: Huntington Beach, CA

Re: New Transmission Mounts

#6 Post by Wil Mittelbach »

Doug McDonnell wrote: Now if someone would make the trans mount the same thickness as they were originally. Lots of old threads discuss that the currently available ones are not the same size as originals.
Quite right! Had purchased new (supposedly proper) replacement mounts, only to find they were thinner than the 50+ year old originals in my C car. To minimize engine sag, I reinstalled the originals and discarded the replacements.

User avatar
Ron LaDow
356 Fan
Posts: 8100
Joined: Wed Mar 26, 2008 11:45 am
Location: San Francisco

Re: New Transmission Mounts

#7 Post by Ron LaDow »

Wil Mittelbach wrote:
Doug McDonnell wrote: Now if someone would make the trans mount the same thickness as they were originally. Lots of old threads discuss that the currently available ones are not the same size as originals.
Quite right! Had purchased new (supposedly proper) replacement mounts, only to find they were thinner than the 50+ year old originals in my C car. To minimize engine sag, I reinstalled the originals and discarded the replacements.
Wil, got an image of the rear engine tin/surround?
Ron LaDow
www.precisionmatters.biz

User avatar
Wil Mittelbach
356 Fan
Posts: 1019
Joined: Sun Apr 13, 2008 8:58 pm
Location: Huntington Beach, CA

Re: New Transmission Mounts

#8 Post by Wil Mittelbach »

Ron LaDow wrote:
Wil Mittelbach wrote:
Doug McDonnell wrote: Now if someone would make the trans mount the same thickness as they were originally. Lots of old threads discuss that the currently available ones are not the same size as originals.
Quite right! Had purchased new (supposedly proper) replacement mounts, only to find they were thinner than the 50+ year old originals in my C car. To minimize engine sag, I reinstalled the originals and discarded the replacements.
Wil, got an image of the rear engine tin/surround?
Ron, herewith are photos:-
Again using the original 50+ yr-old original age-compressed mounts (still thicker than the current German sourced replacements) which results in some engine sag. As an accommodation, I used the depicted wider rubber seal alternative between engine tin and engine compartment floor.
Had considered shimming the mounts, which would require modification of the mount's side transmission bolt location.
Sure wish there were original thickness replacement mounts available.
- Wil
Attachments
DSCN1214.JPG
373-1.JPG
Last edited by Wil Mittelbach on Wed Nov 29, 2017 2:47 am, edited 3 times in total.

User avatar
Mike Wilson
Classifieds Monitor
Posts: 11637
Joined: Tue Apr 15, 2008 4:37 pm
Location: SW Los Angeles

Re: New Transmission Mounts

#9 Post by Mike Wilson »

Very tidy, Wil!

Mike
Mike Wilson
Lomita, CA
'63 B coupe

User avatar
Jim Liberty
356 Registry Member
Posts: 4320
Joined: Tue May 06, 2008 3:47 pm
Tag: Jim
Location: Orange Co., CA
Contact:

Re: New Transmission Mounts

#10 Post by Jim Liberty »

Brad R. Any comment.
Jim Liberty

Brad Ripley
356 Fan
Posts: 4207
Joined: Tue Mar 25, 2008 9:28 pm

Re: New Transmission Mounts

#11 Post by Brad Ripley »

Jim,

Thanks for tossing this one my way. Below is a drawing of the steel part of the trans mount with the length of the stud noted by the arrow. If you have an original mount, it will be marked with words GIMETALL - GETEFO. Please measure the length of the stud (proud of the metal back plate) -- post your findings.

Ed, out of your endeavors, what should be the ideal length of that stud?

Foot note: GIMETALL was a trademark of Metzeler, the German tire maker. GETEFO was a name of a prior German company specializing in rubber-to-metal bonding.
Attachments
Trans mount stud length .jpg

E Rutherford
356 Fan
Posts: 348
Joined: Tue Oct 26, 2010 2:21 pm

Re: New Transmission Mounts

#12 Post by E Rutherford »

I'll post the length tomorrow.

User avatar
DonCichocki
356 Fan
Posts: 522
Joined: Thu Aug 22, 2013 4:29 pm
Location: Lafayette, NJ

Re: New Transmission Mounts

#13 Post by DonCichocki »

How much discrepancy are we talking about between rubber thicknesses from original to the new repros?

Brad Ripley
356 Fan
Posts: 4207
Joined: Tue Mar 25, 2008 9:28 pm

Re: New Transmission Mounts

#14 Post by Brad Ripley »

The mounts as I describe above should be considered as Original Equipment (OE) and come from the original German manufacturer direct to Stoddard NLA. I know of no reproductions being made.

As for the thickness (width) of the rubber, in the past some guys have suggested that the Karmann bodies were slightly different and that engine on those bodies "hanged down" more, creating a gap. Anyone have that theory?

Jon Bunin
356 Fan
Posts: 1805
Joined: Thu Oct 15, 2009 11:06 pm
Location: Vista, CA

Re: New Transmission Mounts

#15 Post by Jon Bunin »

E Rutherford wrote:This year I have run into a problem with the bell housing studs being to long. The first time this happened it caused the engine installation an extra hour (slow to recognize the issue!). Made a mental note of it and installed a new set this week in another car. Checked it with my little straight edge BEFORE installing the engine, sure enough studs were about 3-4m to long. Fixed the problem by grinding them down.
The studs should be 20mm long. That was the original dimension.
I measured about a dozen old mounts that I have here- the majority are 20mm, a few are 21mm. None extend into the path of the flywheel.
Attachments
DSCN1594.JPG
Jon Bunin

Post Reply