carb question on a 1959 1600s ?
- Vic Skirmants
- Registry Hall of Fame
- Posts: 9304
- Joined: Tue Oct 27, 2009 5:02 pm
- Location: SE Michigan
- Contact:
-
- 356 Fan
- Posts: 1030
- Joined: Wed Jun 11, 2008 5:01 pm
-
- 356 Fan
- Posts: 318
- Joined: Sat Nov 05, 2016 11:00 pm
Re: carb question on a 1959 1600s ?
it appears i now have this engine!
-
- 356 Fan
- Posts: 4184
- Joined: Sun Apr 20, 2008 12:54 am
Re: carb question on a 1959 1600s ?
I have 3-different versions of Zenith manifolds to suit the 3-different port sizes or the shapes of the head ports; The early gasket kits had the 1st 2-different openings,
and the later gasket kits have the 2-later gaskets. There were times when the later gaskets were out of stock, so I had to modify/cut some early gaskets to suit the ports.
and the later gasket kits have the 2-later gaskets. There were times when the later gaskets were out of stock, so I had to modify/cut some early gaskets to suit the ports.
-
- 356 Fan
- Posts: 318
- Joined: Sat Nov 05, 2016 11:00 pm
Re: carb question on a 1959 1600s ?
i ended up with this engine.brian johnson wrote: ↑Wed Jul 07, 2010 11:56 pm
Are solex carbs correct for s 1959 1600s. i had read that solex carbs were only on 60-63 super 90? serial p 85211 case 453 thanks
do you recall what cam you used?
trying to figure out what it is and if I will use it for the rebuild.
-
- 356 Fan
- Posts: 4184
- Joined: Sun Apr 20, 2008 12:54 am
Re: carb question on a 1959 1600s ?
My previous mentioning the 3-different Zenith intake manifolds, the 2nd one for a Super had its port end flaired out to match the early head ports.
The worse situation is using the later manifolds for the the small-port heads which leaves about a 1/8" step
to upset smooth intake flow to the heads.
The worse situation is using the later manifolds for the the small-port heads which leaves about a 1/8" step
to upset smooth intake flow to the heads.
- Vic Skirmants
- Registry Hall of Fame
- Posts: 9304
- Joined: Tue Oct 27, 2009 5:02 pm
- Location: SE Michigan
- Contact:
Re: carb question on a 1959 1600s ?
I am only familiar with two Zenith manifolds. The flared port ones were for the C heads, which had larger ports like the S-90, SC, 912. The 1960-63 Supers had the same ports as the Normals.Dick Weiss wrote: ↑Tue Oct 08, 2019 1:08 pm My previous mentioning the 3-different Zenith intake manifolds, the 2nd one for a Super had its port end flaired out to match the early head ports.
The worse situation is using the later manifolds for the the small-port heads which leaves about a 1/8" step
to upset smooth intake flow to the heads.
-
- 356 Fan
- Posts: 318
- Joined: Sat Nov 05, 2016 11:00 pm
Re: carb question on a 1959 1600s ?
I rebuilt this 1959 1600 S engine #85211 for my 59 coupe.
1720 cc
DR268 cam
1720 cc
DR268 cam
- Martin Benade
- 356 Fan
- Posts: 12392
- Joined: Wed Nov 23, 2011 10:52 am
- Location: Cleveland, Ohio
Re: carb question on a 1959 1600s ?
Tom, does the pictured engine still have the Solexes on it with Super heads? That gives a pretty big port mismatch, although my friend did that and it ran OK.
Cleveland Ohio
62 Cabriolet
56 VW
02 IS 300
04 Sienna
62 Cabriolet
56 VW
02 IS 300
04 Sienna
-
- 356 Fan
- Posts: 318
- Joined: Sat Nov 05, 2016 11:00 pm
Re: carb question on a 1959 1600s ?
We ended up pulling the Zenith carbs off another engine for this build. We had two complete motors and put together this motor with the best parts.Martin Benade wrote: ↑Mon Mar 16, 2020 12:55 am Tom, does the pictured engine still have the Solexes on it with Super heads? That gives a pretty big port mismatch, although my friend did that and it ran OK.
-
- 356 Fan
- Posts: 4184
- Joined: Sun Apr 20, 2008 12:54 am
Re: carb question on a 1959 1600s ?
Vic,
The difference in manifolds are their port ends having a full smooth face vs. the cast-in pockets version.
A little lighter--for racing, altho they'll have the smaller openings.
Dick
The difference in manifolds are their port ends having a full smooth face vs. the cast-in pockets version.
A little lighter--for racing, altho they'll have the smaller openings.
Dick
- Vic Skirmants
- Registry Hall of Fame
- Posts: 9304
- Joined: Tue Oct 27, 2009 5:02 pm
- Location: SE Michigan
- Contact:
Re: carb question on a 1959 1600s ?
I forgot about those! Thanks for reminding me.Dick Weiss wrote: ↑Mon Mar 16, 2020 10:45 pm Vic,
The difference in manifolds are their port ends having a full smooth face vs. the cast-in pockets version.
A little lighter--for racing, altho they'll have the smaller openings.
Dick
-
- 356 Fan
- Posts: 318
- Joined: Sat Nov 05, 2016 11:00 pm
Re: carb question on a 1959 1600s ?
correction, we ended up using webbers!
- Martin Benade
- 356 Fan
- Posts: 12392
- Joined: Wed Nov 23, 2011 10:52 am
- Location: Cleveland, Ohio
Re: carb question on a 1959 1600s ?
With manifolds that matched the ports?
Cleveland Ohio
62 Cabriolet
56 VW
02 IS 300
04 Sienna
62 Cabriolet
56 VW
02 IS 300
04 Sienna
-
- 356 Fan
- Posts: 318
- Joined: Sat Nov 05, 2016 11:00 pm
Re: carb question on a 1959 1600s ?
we had webbers and manifolds from another 1959 1600 super motor in the hoard.
- Attachments
-
- IMG_2295.jpg (577.61 KiB) Viewed 1165 times